My reasoning for agreeing with those that called for the Oscar nomination to be revoked is because I t
During the final scene were Said was on the bus, he was focused on carrying out the mission. He took no time to look around. There were several soldiers, but also many women, children, fathers, brothers, sons, grandparents, wives, etc. He was only focused on what this would do for him and his family. To me this was very selfish and it made my blood curdle. The thought that someone would kill themselves but also kill a bus full of unsuspecting innocent people should be received with disdain from all viewers. Suicide bombers again are radical terrorist and I do not feel the film showed them in a negative light at all. The film made them likable, made us feel for them and not for those around them.
I don't believe that we should allow censorship based on whether or not a topic is offensive or controversial, but I do think that we need to start drawing a line when it comes to glorifying certain behaviors. If we continue to glorify dangerous behavior then we cannot be surprised when these cruel acts continue to happen. Some may start to lean towards drawing this line when it is one of their innocent unsuspecting loved ones caught in such a situation. If you disagree look up the facts on serial killers and where many of them got their sadistic ideas and learned to evade capture..........
RE your comment "Suicide bombers again are radical terrorist and I do not feel the film showed them in a negative light at all." Is it the responsibility of all art to show all behavior in a negative or positive light? Who gets to decide? Does art have a moral responsibility and if so, whose morals must that art reflect? Just ours? (And we can't use 'God's' because there's more than just one set of religious rules that have equal claims to 'godliness,' and many of them conflict with each other.)
ReplyDelete